AstraEye Labs
Sign InEnter the Lab
AstraEye Labs · Research methods · SCOUT
SCOUTCryptoGalactic Merchant plan

Ecosystem Sector Map

Build or update a structured view of the crypto ecosystem

  1. 01
    What it answers
  2. 02
    How it is computed
  3. !
    Keep in mind
  4. →
    Read a real report
Impersonal research. AstraEye Labs is not a registered investment adviser, does not give financial advice, and does not know your goals or risk tolerance. This research does not account for your individual goals, risk tolerance, financial situation, or other circumstances. Past performance does not predict future results.
01The analysis

What it answers

Builds a structured map of the crypto ecosystem by sector (Layer 1, DeFi, meme, and so on), showing which sectors carry the most market weight in the tracked universe and where a category has little to no representation. It categorizes liquid, established coins by their market sector tags and ranks sectors by combined market capitalization. Coverage naturally lags for brand-new or thinly-tracked assets whose sector data hasn't synced yet - those are counted separately, not silently dropped.

Scientist
SCOUT
Asset class
Crypto
Plan
Included from the Galactic Merchant plan
02The method

How it is computed

Mapping the market by sector - a structural view, built on a taxonomy that does not officially exist.

WHAT IT DOES. Categorises liquid, established coins by market sector tag, showing which sectors carry the most market weight in the tracked universe and where a category has little or no representation.

WHY A STRUCTURAL MAP IS USEFUL AT ALL. Most analysis in this catalog is about individual assets or a portfolio. A map answers a different question: what does the opportunity set actually contain, and how is value distributed across it. That is the crypto analogue of knowing the sector composition of an equity index, and it is the context against which any portfolio's composition should be read.

THE TAXONOMY PROBLEM IS UNAVOIDABLE, and it is the same one the sector-rotation analyses face. Crypto has no single accepted classification comparable to GICS - vendors maintain competing schemes, tags are assigned by differing rules, and an asset commonly carries several. So sector weights are partly an artefact of the tagging scheme, and a map from one vendor's tags is not comparable to a map from another's.

MARKET WEIGHT IS PRICE TIMES CIRCULATING SUPPLY, which means sector weights move with PRICE. A sector 'carrying the most market weight' has, to a large extent, most recently performed - so the map describes the market's current valuation of each area rather than its size in any other sense. Read a change in sector weight as a price change unless something else establishes otherwise.

'LITTLE OR NO REPRESENTATION' IS THE MORE INTERESTING OUTPUT, and it needs careful reading. A sparsely represented category in the TRACKED universe may be genuinely small, or it may be excluded by the universe filters - too illiquid, too small, too new to clear the thresholds. Those are opposite conclusions, and the map cannot distinguish them. The absence is a fact about the universe as much as about the market: every screener inherits the universe's filters.

AND A GAP IS NOT AN OPPORTUNITY. That a category is thinly represented says nothing about whether it should be larger. Concentration in a few sectors may reflect where value has genuinely accrued.

Keep in mind

The sector definitions and the weighting are our own convention, and this is descriptive.

✦Read a real report

From a method to a finding

Published reports are readable without an account. The newest is Ether (ETH) and XRP extend a month-long slide as Bitcoin falls below $75,000: trend, momentum and news (Nov 9, 2026). Create an account to run research on the stocks and crypto you choose.